These last two weeks you have worked on your investigation process. Reflect and rate yourself using the rubric PLUS copy your response to your blog. Post with the subject INVESTIGATION REFLECTION. When you are finished continue with your 3 brainstorming designs.
0 You did not reach a standard described by any of the descriptors given below.
1–2 (60 / 70)You stated the problem.
You investigated the problem, collecting information from few sources.
You listed some specification points.
3-4 (75 / 85) You described the problem, mentioning its relevance.
You investigated the problem, selecting and analysing information from some acknowledged sources.
You described a test to evaluate the product/solution against the design specification.
5-6 (95 / 100) You explained the problem, discussing its relevance.
You critically investigated the problem, evaluating information from a broad range of appropriate, acknowledged sources.
You described detailed methods for appropriate testing to evaluate the product/solution against the design specification.
my rating should at least be a 5 because of the work i have done with my project. i have taken time to understand how and what to do with the design cycle. also i made good progress during the investigation process and now i'm in the plan-create process. this is why i believe i should have at least a five because of the time it took me to find the software that was okay for the 6th grader to use of easy steps. and i also took my creativity to the next level because of what i added to the making of the game
No comments:
Post a Comment